28 Years Later is part three of Danny Boyle’s post-apocalyptic saga begun in 28 Days Later. It has, in fact, been more than 20 years since the first film. Critics were impressed (88% at Rotten Tomatoes), and the box office has been sturdy ($70 million domestic, $150 million worldwide so far).
It’s been almost three decades since the rage virus escaped from a biological weapons laboratory. Still living in a ruthlessly enforced quarantine, some have found ways to exist amid the infected. One such group of survivors lives on a small island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily defended causeway. When one of them decides to venture into the dark heart of the mainland, he soon discovers a mutation that has spread to not only the infected, but other survivors as well.
Celi and some others are naked, in theory, but she’s wearing prosthetic breasts and, in the second scene, gives birth through CGI
There’s not much sense in capturing any stills. It’s stuff like this:
But here are the film clips if you’re curious.
Critics obviously liked it, as they always give high scores to movies that feature naked male genitalia every few minutes. 28 Years Later is considered a box office failure, considering its high production and marketing budget. A second installment has already been shot, but considering the box office results, it’s unclear whether a third installment will be made. A trilogy of movies was planned, but it’s likely to end with just two.
You seriously need help.
Also your fantasy narrative is full of holes. “28 Years Later is considered a box office hit, grossing over $150 million worldwide against a $60 million budget”
They shot 2 movies back to back to save on budget, so it’s highly likely if the sequel tracks financially, then the 3rd movie will happen.
But keep eating those mushrooms you find out behind your house apparently you have vivid dreams and fantasies no one else does and they remind you of the thing you seemed to be obsessed with. But I digress.
Do you even realize how the box office works? In the US alone, a film must earn twice its budget to even start making money. In other countries, these proportions are even worse. And budget for this movie was not 60 mln but 80 mln with marketing included.
Did you think I pulled that quote out of thin air???
If it’s generally reported from multiple sources that it did well financially, why in the holy heck do you think otherwise? What data are you referring to that says the contrary, except your intuition / imagination?
You seem to be obsessed with many things (penises non-withstanding) but your true calling doesn’t seem to be box office results. I know some people tolerate your rhetoric, but some of us more silent readers, are tired of the shtick. Since literally every post is dick this, dick that.
And if someone posts factual data that is counterpoint to your wholly false opinions, you claim that it’s fake news, yet you are unable to back those claims up with no data or factual data.
I did look into the box office, to see if it succeeded financially from multiple sources to refute your fake claim and found nothing to back up your phony claim that it was a box office failure, or if a third movie wouldn’t be made because of that and it’s a conspiracy because of all of the penises in it, since that’s all you seem to be able to focus on in every one of your posts.
Again, get help…