From my mailbox:
Former singer of The Regrettes, now solo and launching a pop career, is good at Instagram.
If you browse through her other posts, there’s a lot of cheeky stuff.
Contrary to what it might say below, the link is still there.
There’s no “may” involved in the existence of a post. Unlike most things in life, that is a forced binary choice. Either it is there or it isn’t. I used to think this was bad programming, but I’ve changed my mind. I think it’s just a backdoor way to get you to their site. They proclaim to bloggers like me that this is “embed code” when it fact it is designed to fail, and therefore to force you to their site rather than viewing it here.
Given that explanation, the use of the word “may” makes sense. They avoid outright fraud by saying the post “may” have been removed, although they know full well it had not at the time that message started appearing. That message appears immediately, while the linked post obviously still exists. Of course, given that internet links last for years, sooner or later there is a possibility that people will read that message after the post has actually disappeared. The longer the link stays up, the greater the possibility that the post no longer exists.
Tricky. Perfectly legal. But totally sleazy.


