Spanish singer and actress Ana Mena showing nipple in a sexy see through dress at the Los40 Music Awards in Valencia! Full gallery Share via: Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn More
Lili Reinhart at the premiere of The Strangers: Chapter 1 in Los Angeles! You have to read between the lines. Sample: Share via: Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn More
Not to be outdone by the Lakers, the Clippers also have their own drama series, centering on the 2013-2014 season, which was their best regular season (57 wins). As the team rises, the owner falls. Near the end of the season, owner Donald Sterling is banned from the NBA for…
Watch closely. Full frontal nudity was exclusively from men; they even did special slow motion for scenes with naked cocks in the foreground. There are no full frontal female characters in this scene. Only glimpses of merkin in quick shots.
Naked extras, nobodies are not interesting. The internet is full of them. For me it’s interesting if an actual actress does it (even if I don’t know her) who usually does non nude rules and it’s an exception when she gets naked.
I agree, but I try to report on everything that’s going on. If there were famous women in that scene, I would have included many captures. As there are none, I pointed that out and linked to the film clip for those who are interested.
I’m honestly usually more interested in what the nudity is used for than who is nude, especially these days when the women I was interested in my formative years have either A – already been nude, and/or B – don’t look like they did back then anyway. I thought this scene was pretty fun to look at, and definitely more entertaining than 95% of what’s on the internet.
Plus there’s always the chance that an actress in this scene will become famous enough in the future to make this worth having a record of for that reason too.
Too many merkins, sadly. I used to think full frontal female nudity was the one thing mankind couldn’t ruin, and then they came up with Brazillian waxing and merkins.
This is so fallacious and borders on historical ignorance. Merkins have always existed in Hollywood and even in French films… Very few actresses have shown their vaginas shaved in a film, especially famous actresses, even fewer.
Merkins were not common in the past. They became common when women started fully shaving their pubic area which is what the original comment is referring to. His point was not that fully shaved women were shown but that real public hair was shown.
I will also say it is completely unnecessary for them to use merkins in this scene. Since it is just a bunch of extras they could have easily cast women who would do the scene without fake pubic hair.
Buddy, to give you an idea, veteran actress Ellen Barkin mentioned using Merkin in a film she made in the 80s. She told about an incident related to it, etc. In the 80s and 90s, many women already shaved their vaginas because that’s when such techniques started to become popular. In fact, it only became so popular that almost all women shaved in the 2000s, and even then, you can’t consider this a current argument, because at least this has been happening since the early 2000s. in reality it’s been happening since at least the 80s, as I showed. And another thing, what’s the difference between a Merkin and real pubic hair? In many cases, you can’t even tell the difference. In this scene from Peacemaker, for example, they seem to be very realistic Merkins, if they are actually Merkins, because today there are still women who don’t shave.
A recent poll indicated that 82% of straight women remove ‘some’ of their pubic hair, but only 15% of respondents said they removed all of it. About 40% maintain a bikini shaped-bush, only removing the hair that would stick out of a bikini bottom, And among those responding, 29.5% reported having either a full bush or a slightly trimmed full bush, and 11% leave a small landing strip.
@Ric10
“And another thing, what’s the difference between a Merkin and real pubic hair?”
The difference is one is real and the other is fake. The same reason no one wants to seeing an actress naked if the nudity is done with prosthetics, CGI, or AI no matter how realistic it is. Knowing that it is fake removes the appeal, the same applies to merkins.
James gunn seems to like pushing it. Kid Friendly for DC? nope.
Yes, no one really wants to see fake nudity from AI, CGI, prosthetics, etc., even though this has been very common in cinema for decades. But yes, I would tell you to get used to the merkins buddy, because as I said, this has been happening since the 80s and in the early 2000s it increased a lot in Hollywood and there will be no going back, unless the actresses want to show their shaved vaginas, and they probably wouldn’t be their real vaginas either, they would be fake prosthetic vaginas, just like the penises of the actors are fake, the vast majority of the time.
I’m not going to get bothered by the presence of penises or bogged down by the logistics of merkins and just say that I never would have guessed that a DC show would have the most nudity of any English-language TV show this year so far. I know the first season had some nudity, but I’m a bit surprised they pushed it this far (especially after Peacemaker just had a cameo in the new Superman movie). I hope they do more, but I’m guessing this will probably be the best (and maybe only) nude scene this season.
Watch closely. Full frontal nudity was exclusively from men; they even did special slow motion for scenes with naked cocks in the foreground. There are no full frontal female characters in this scene. Only glimpses of merkin in quick shots.
I think you have female nudity blindness.
You can literally see a woman’s pussy lips and asshole at the 34 second mark
Naked extras, nobodies are not interesting. The internet is full of them. For me it’s interesting if an actual actress does it (even if I don’t know her) who usually does non nude rules and it’s an exception when she gets naked.
I agree, but I try to report on everything that’s going on. If there were famous women in that scene, I would have included many captures. As there are none, I pointed that out and linked to the film clip for those who are interested.
I’m honestly usually more interested in what the nudity is used for than who is nude, especially these days when the women I was interested in my formative years have either A – already been nude, and/or B – don’t look like they did back then anyway. I thought this scene was pretty fun to look at, and definitely more entertaining than 95% of what’s on the internet.
Plus there’s always the chance that an actress in this scene will become famous enough in the future to make this worth having a record of for that reason too.
Is there so much that we will need a bigger boat?
Too many merkins, sadly. I used to think full frontal female nudity was the one thing mankind couldn’t ruin, and then they came up with Brazillian waxing and merkins.
This is so fallacious and borders on historical ignorance. Merkins have always existed in Hollywood and even in French films… Very few actresses have shown their vaginas shaved in a film, especially famous actresses, even fewer.
Merkins were not common in the past. They became common when women started fully shaving their pubic area which is what the original comment is referring to. His point was not that fully shaved women were shown but that real public hair was shown.
I will also say it is completely unnecessary for them to use merkins in this scene. Since it is just a bunch of extras they could have easily cast women who would do the scene without fake pubic hair.
Buddy, to give you an idea, veteran actress Ellen Barkin mentioned using Merkin in a film she made in the 80s. She told about an incident related to it, etc. In the 80s and 90s, many women already shaved their vaginas because that’s when such techniques started to become popular. In fact, it only became so popular that almost all women shaved in the 2000s, and even then, you can’t consider this a current argument, because at least this has been happening since the early 2000s. in reality it’s been happening since at least the 80s, as I showed. And another thing, what’s the difference between a Merkin and real pubic hair? In many cases, you can’t even tell the difference. In this scene from Peacemaker, for example, they seem to be very realistic Merkins, if they are actually Merkins, because today there are still women who don’t shave.
A recent poll indicated that 82% of straight women remove ‘some’ of their pubic hair, but only 15% of respondents said they removed all of it. About 40% maintain a bikini shaped-bush, only removing the hair that would stick out of a bikini bottom, And among those responding, 29.5% reported having either a full bush or a slightly trimmed full bush, and 11% leave a small landing strip.
@Ric10
“And another thing, what’s the difference between a Merkin and real pubic hair?”
The difference is one is real and the other is fake. The same reason no one wants to seeing an actress naked if the nudity is done with prosthetics, CGI, or AI no matter how realistic it is. Knowing that it is fake removes the appeal, the same applies to merkins.
James gunn seems to like pushing it. Kid Friendly for DC? nope.
DC is for kids, but Peacemaker was never for kids lol
@JamesO
Yes, no one really wants to see fake nudity from AI, CGI, prosthetics, etc., even though this has been very common in cinema for decades. But yes, I would tell you to get used to the merkins buddy, because as I said, this has been happening since the 80s and in the early 2000s it increased a lot in Hollywood and there will be no going back, unless the actresses want to show their shaved vaginas, and they probably wouldn’t be their real vaginas either, they would be fake prosthetic vaginas, just like the penises of the actors are fake, the vast majority of the time.
Well, if you’re going to get women/gay men to watch something like this. Show some dick. It balances the playing field when it comes to nudity.
I say I see no problem with having male nudity as long as there is female nudity at the same level too.
Would love to know the name of the extra with the fat pale ass bouncing on that guy’s dick.
I’m not going to get bothered by the presence of penises or bogged down by the logistics of merkins and just say that I never would have guessed that a DC show would have the most nudity of any English-language TV show this year so far. I know the first season had some nudity, but I’m a bit surprised they pushed it this far (especially after Peacemaker just had a cameo in the new Superman movie). I hope they do more, but I’m guessing this will probably be the best (and maybe only) nude scene this season.
This is awesome, even though it was shorter this was way more explicit than anything shown in the Herogasm episode of The Boys.
Names are of the girls listed here.