Was Gitte’s fame really that long ago? That’s 37 years. She was 23 or 24, but looked more mature. And what a powerful look it was!
Photo by Helmut Newton

Uncle Scoopy's world-weary musings about naked celebrities, sports, humor and other important, manly things.
Was Gitte’s fame really that long ago? That’s 37 years. She was 23 or 24, but looked more mature. And what a powerful look it was!
Photo by Helmut Newton

She is still an imposing presence now.
Share via:
German actress Kate Marell in some explicit sex scenes where she has 100% real sex with a guy and some soft lesbian action in a short film from 2018 Share via: Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn More
French drama/fantasy Daphné loves Abel and can’t imagine a life without him. But that night, the call of the sea becomes irresistible. More mermaid fantasy? Man, France is really into mermaids. France rom-com pitch: A mermaid falls for a mime, but they have trouble communicating. Video Daphne always delivers the…
Wikipedia describes it as, “a 2024 romantic comedy science fiction film.” Follows Mort who discovers he has less than a year to live, and after his fiancé leaves him, he meets Kate in a dating service that matches people by their death dates, all while being stalked by a disturbed…
Married to Sly for two years; almost forgot that
Funny, to me that’s the first thing that comes to mind.
The first thing that comes to mind for me are the silicone basketballs on her chest. I liked her better without, and even if she felt sizing up would help her career, those are just ludicrous, IMO. But it was her choice. I guess she knew what she wanted.
It is always better without. Even itty-bitty titties are lovely – I am a fan. Rock what you’ve got.
Likely alone, but I preferred her with her original equipment. She (imho) never got the balance right and they always looked too large for her frame.
Without consulting Gallup, I would submit that is probably the majority opinion.
Except for maybe the Kristine Debell photos, Newton’s stuff was never that hot, very antiseptic
He was not a man known for warmth. That reveals itself in his work – clinical and technically flawless, but without much real humanity.
I thought that was what he was going for – a clinical look at things that are usually not looked at clinically. But that would require knowing something about art, I suppose, and that leaves me out.
I agree with your observation, but join you in artistic ignorance, so perhaps we are both very wrong.
All depended who he shot: Nielsen does nothing for me, but 70s Charlotte Rampling, now we’re talkin’