And nameless others topless.
There was also this scene with Tenika Davis. I can’t tell what she is wearing, if anything, over her breasts.
Whoa! Full-frontal nudity from Jamie Slater in episode 6 of The House of Ashur
Other Crap
Uncle Scoopy's world-weary musings about naked celebrities, sports, humor and other important, manly things.
It makes me laugh when someone calls it full frontal. Even the men in this episode were more full frontal than the women, because their fake genitalia were looking real. Women in this show have unrealistic merkin, something that can’t be replicated in real life, because in real life, even if a woman has pubic hair, her genitals are still partially visible. In the series Spartacus, every woman has the same merkin unnaturally covering everything, which is so fucking unrealistic it’s laughable, like whole America.
Yep, multiple actresses said in a video, that it’s not full nudity, because it’s like wearing small fur panties.
BTW, real life pubic hair covers well, so they could just grow it out. A pretty example from this very blog:
That’s pretty much the only way it could look in a period piece, unless you can find an actress who still has pubic hair (which would look the same).
By the way, it is often true that the pubic hair covers everything. Demi Moore was so hairy that you couldn’t even see anything with her legs open!
The irony is Roman women shaved: “Yes, Roman women removed body hair, including potentially shaving, plucking, or using depilatories, as hairlessness was a sign of sophistication, cleanliness, and higher social status, though methods like pumice stones, tweezers, and sugaring pastes were common alongside razors, especially in the upper classes and at public baths, to achieve smooth skin on legs, arms, and underarms. ”
So they should be completely hairless in nude scenes.
What historical writers call “The Tiffany Problem”– when something that IS historically accurate (for example, that “Tiffany” is a historically accurate medieval name) will FEEL inaccurate to most audience. Full pubic hair depilation FEELS like a very modern thing, even though it’s been around for millennia. Remember the media complaining about the “King’s Landing Strip” ladies had in Game of Thrones?
Exactly. I speak from experience; if my wife lets her pubic hair grow to its maximum length, i can’t see her vagina. And I can guarantee she’s not wearing a “Merkin” lol. So yes, if most women let their pubic hair grow to its maximum length, you can’t see their vagina; it completely covers it. Anyone who says otherwise has probably never seen a vagina in their life. And no, the penis of the actors in this series aren’t realistic at all lol
Oy vey the ladies pube understanders have logged on
Not entirely true actually. Even with lovely full pubic hair,, if your face is just few inches or less away from her you can see her vulva just as clear as day. In movies, other than porn, the camera is not going to get that close, but you can and should, obviously.
Also, I am disappointed that people are not following the advice not to respond to the Dawid troll.
Better idea: how about Scoop bans him?
Demi Moore and several actresses of that era had pubic hair that covered their entire vagina. And in fact, some actresses were already using Merkin in the past, because many of them were already in the habit of completely shaving their pubic hair.
When was the last time there was an actual full frontal or shot of real pubes in something mainstream? There is probably no more than 5 examples since 2000( Rosario Dawson,Matilda de Angelis,Alexandra Daddario by Accident and brightening a lot) are the only ones i recall.
I don’t want to shatter anyone’s dreams, but Rosario Dawson’s vagina in that iconic scene from Trance is most likely a prosthetic, not a real vagina. I say this because real photos of Rosario Dawson have leaked, and her vagina appeared in some of those leaks… And simply, It’s not the same vagina. So, even if you see a shaved vagina in a movie, there’s a good chance it’s a prosthetic or something similar, like they do with penis scenes today.
It would literally scare me if some of the people in these comments would spend TWO minutes to look something up instead of coming up with some imagined FAKE version of whatever truth you decided to dream up.
“Yes, Rosario Dawson shaved for her role in director Danny Boyle’s 2013 film Trance, portraying her character’s transformation and shedding layers of vulnerability by shaving her pubic hair for a revealing full-frontal nudity scene, a choice she made to reflect her character’s intense journey, not due to a personal relationship with Boyle”
That’s literally all of Rosario, not CGI, merkin or prosthetic. It’s out there in multiple articles that she discusses her decision to do it for the film. Maybe make that a new years resolution to you know look something up.
I’ve already researched all of this, buddy. I know about her statements regarding that scene in that movie… don’t believe me, look up her leaked nude photos yourself, they’re real photos. Look at her leaked photos and then watch the scene from that movie, there’s no way to tell it’s the same vagina lol. Anyone can see that.
Check out Dr. Skin over here “Pffft that’s not her REAL vag” lmao, is the 10 in your name how many brain cells you carry?
I’ve seen those same leaked photos you speak of and there’s nothing to suggest that wasn’t her vagina. None of the angles are similar so it’s hard to tell, but nothing suggests that it clearly was a prosthetic. Coupled with the statement, I’m inclined to believe that was actually her.
There are close-up shots of her vagina and shots with her facing the mirror. Her vagina in those leaked photos is much smaller, with small labia. In that scene from the movie, her vaginal labia are much more prominent; it can’t be the same vagina. And yes, that’s clear in the photos.
Too bad it’s a merkin, but she’s still a beautiful woman.
Some people are far too precious and whiny about merkins.
To paraphrase The Sopranos, “NOBODY SHAVED IN GLADIATOR TIMES”
I would put her in a tie with Ricci & Wiig for the most laughably bad merkins I’ve ever seen. What a waste of donkey hair.
Dang. I originally thought it said “Jenny Slate”…
Merkin alert.
it is absolutely comical the way that some on this forum will immediately say “that must be a merkin” the moment that they see a bit of public hair. For those of you unfamiliar with female pubic hair – and even more for those who ARE familiar with it and LOVE it – I offer you a gift:. a link to the OldSchoolCoolNSFW subReddit.
That’s a great link, buddy. It’s what I said before, whoever says that it’s always possible to see a woman’s vagina even if she has pubic hair, and if it’s not possible it means she’s a Merkin… Whoever says that has never seen a real woman’s vagina in person lol
I find it comical you think actresses aren’t going to use it when they are avail plus most actresses are shaved nowadays this is a period piece wake up the movie want people like you so you imagine what they want you too. My cousin who produced Zapped and In the Line of Fire say most producers have trouble with actresses and nudity merkins now even used for main movies and have gotten better to manicure so people like you are convinced its pubic hair
Useless merkin jerkin aside, she is apparently 50 years old here and totally buff. A very lovely woman.