Authorities in California say she fatally suffocated a man who hired her to come to his Escondido home and perform BDSM acts for $11,000.
Cops say she sat by and filmed content with a vibrator while her alleged victim, Michael Dale, suffocated to death with a plastic bag, Saran Wrap, and duct tape sealed around his head.

Wonder how quickly it’ll take for her husband to distance himself from his wife/business partner/baby mama/ accomplice.
Yeah, good luck with the Accessory To Murder charge.
Huh? Her husband hasn’t been charged with being an accessory to murder.
Yet. But if they worked together to arrange this “appointment” then he absolutely will be charged as an accessory. And considering they were business partners, it’s almost certain he had full knowledge of this “date” and what would be entailed (BDSM-wise).
Big whoopsie. Wifey screwed them both.
I don’t think that would be suffiicient for an accessory to murder charge – it would be necessary to show that he either knew she was planning to kill the guy, or that he knew she killed the guy and helped him hide it. She didn’t try to hide it – she called 911 – and he can easily just say “she had a booking as an escort, I never ask the details”. He’ll probably be found guilty of pimping, but unless there is some concrete evidence that show otherwise, it will be hard to disprove a claim of “I thought she was only going to do safe stuff, otherwise I would have stopped her”.
My guess is that the murder charge won’t stick to her either, by the way, and she will eventually plead guilty to manslaughter.
That article said she was charged with killing the guy, but it didn’t say what the actual charge was. I thought the charge would likely be manslaughter because it’s highly unlikely that she intended to kill the guy. But according to the LA Times, she was charged with murder. That would almost certainly be depraved heart murder. They will argue that she was extremely reckless and showed a callous disregard for human life. Given that she recorded what she did to the guy, that may be very easy to prove. They may offer a manslaughter plea deal. Manslaughter may be a lesser included charge that the jury could convict her of instead of murder. The one thing she will not get is a Not Guilty verdict. I’d say, she might have a shot at a pardon from Trump, but he can’t pardon her for a state crime.
I don’t care how much $$$ it is how can you ever let another guy fuck your wife
Not everyone is puritanical. Plenty of open relationships of various kinds
New fact I learned today: Not wanting another guy to fuck your wife is puritanical. Thanks, Tim.
Thinking of it in terms of “another guy is fucking your wife” and not “your wife is fucking another guy” feels rather puritanical to me, because it makes it sound like the issue is a competition between men, and denies agency to the wife.