I’m excited to join OnlyFans because it offers the opportunity for a more personal and direct connection.
“‘Knots Landing’ Star Donna Mills Joins OnlyFans at 85 Years Old”
Other Crap
Uncle Scoopy's world-weary musings about naked celebrities, sports, humor and other important, manly things.
I hope I never come across her onlyfans account, this isn’t meant for her age’ if she had been thirty or forty years younger again I would check out her account if I wanted too’ but I don’t believe that’s gonna happen at all. I wouldn’t mind if Mimi Rogers makes her own someday, I believe she’s still good at her age until she reaches 80′ that’s probably when her hotness is gone!
star Shannon Elizabeth launched her own OnlyFans profile in April and earned more than $1.2 million in her first seven days on the platform…Mills needs the money?
She was in the bunny mag almost 40(!) years ago (November 1989) and didn’t show a stitch. You’d have to go back almost another 20 years (1971) to get a quick peek with Eastwood’s Play Misty for Me.
Not sure who this is for, other than she’s hoping for a money grift, I don’t suspect we’ll see her showing her goods this late in the game and most of the people that remember her in her prime are mostly retirees, so yeah.
She was in Playboy twice. One was a contemporary shoot where she was fully clothed and the other where she was nude but only showed her bum and a hint of bush. And that was a photoshoot from the ’60s. Looks like that’s also the type of content she will be sharing on OF. She said she posed for a lot of those type of photos that weren’t publicly available. She says she also might do current sexy photos. She doesn’t really look too bad for someone who’s in their 80S, but I’m sure it’s all makeup and lighting etc.
She wasn’t even recognizable in that pictorial in the November, 1989 edition. She was about 50 at the time, but she looked to be about 25 in those photos.
As you say, maybe she has more of those treasures from the 1960s that have never surfaced.
I had forgotten about the Nov. ’89 appearance, but honestly, since those pictures were purchased for publication, she didn’t do it specifically for the magazine. (those were taken by Earle Doud around ~1966)
That’s like saying any of the actresses in the yearly Sex Stars were ‘in’ the magazine or that Uma Thurman posed for the magazine. That’s splitting hairs to me.
Heck, even the most famous being Marilyn Monroe, those were all purchased for publication, she never posed for the magazine either. But I digress.
I read all of the articles yesterday, she seems very wishy-washy if she’ll doff top current day. And unless she has tons of cheesecake photos from early and in the prime of her career, I’m not expecting much as I said above.
I also wonder why both of her ‘appearances’ shared the same title ‘Oh Donna!’ in ’87 & ’89, that’s strange and confusing (and some sites credit Freytag as the photog on both, which is wrong)
Topless pix from the 60’s sounds good to me. She was pretty. Otherwise, right, not excited by or expecting anything else.