Jill St John (first 14 images) and Elke Summer. (Non-nude)
All comments and images from Whitecaps:
The Oscar is regarded as one of those “so bad it’s good movies.” It’s melodramatic to well past the point of camp, a film about a person (Stephen Boyd as Frankie Fane) who lucks into a (briefly) successful acting career. The film is star-studded, including Milton Berle as Fane’s agent and Tony Bennett, named Hymie Kelly, as Fane’s lifelong friend. This was Tony Bennett’s first and last major screen role.
Every line of dialogue is so overwrought that at one point I thought Fane would yell to Tony Bennett, “Hymie I’m not going to tell you again…No more wire hangers! EVER!”
However, so much has been written about the camp nature of the film that I’d like to focus instead on what sort of message this film was trying to send.
The film was based on a novel of the same name with the screenplay co-written by Harlan Ellison. I didn’t notice when watching, but when I went back to cap it, the film is very episodic. The film is exactly 2 hours long and basically comprises eight fifteen-minute segments. The film could have even titled the segments.
The film is mostly told in flashback with Tony Bennett’s occasional narration about how Fane had made it to the top by getting a nomination for best actor (which he is expected to win), but has destroyed everybody he ever met to get there.
However, I don’t think this is really the case. Basically Fane is a hothead with a hair-trigger temper who can’t stand being personally slighted, and who occasionally gets revenge. Other than the getting revenge part and not having as much of a hair-trigger temper, Rocky Balboa was presented the exact same way (in the first Rocky especially) and was the hero.
To demonstrate how bad Fane is supposed to be, every few minutes a person tells him “you’re evil” or “you’re horrible.” This is especially the case with the Elke Summer character who tells him this when he talks back to a major female Hollywood producer. While I also appreciate the importance of people listening and respecting others with more experience or expertise than they, the message I got was “you little people need to learn to stay in your station and respect your superiors.”
And for most of the film, Fane gets his revenge by using those who used him, including the female Hollywood producer, for whom he was a gigolo.
Fane does turn darker at exactly the one-hour mark when he has become the biggest actor in Hollywood. In addition to Fane badly mistreating his wife, it turns the studio has messed up, as a studio flunky failed to get Fane to renew his contract before it expired. His agent, Milton Berle, explains this to him and Fane tells him he wants a new negotiation as he felt the studio head slighted him when he was first signed. Berle tells him “This isn’t how things in done, you’d better be careful.” Berle’s character is played as extremely ethical, but isn’t he just defending the one-sided studio system here?
But Berle is correct, as exactly 15 minutes later (actually 14 minutes but that’s nitpicking), when Berle – some years later – is hoping to renew that contract, the studio head tells him to forget it, that not only have Fane’s on-set antics cost a lot of money but that Fane is “box office poison.”
I won’t spoil the ending. However, this is directly preceded by Fane having one of the most over-the-top movie nightmares ever. I do think though, that despite what the movie thinks it has made clear about Fane, and as nasty as Fane has become, what he does at the end is completely out of character.
Scoop’s note:
One of the many odd things about this film is the fact that many Hollywood heavyweights and actual Oscar winners appeared in this film, several of them as themselves. Bob Hope, Frank Sinatra, Merle Oberon, Hedda Hopper and Edith Head1 are among the members of Hollywood royalty that played fictional versions of themselves. In effect, that serves as a suggestion that the action that the critics called “unrealistic” and “over-the-top” may not have been as far from the mark as those critics believed. Perhaps the road to the top in Old Hollywood really did consist of everyone pushing everyone else off the cliff beside the shoulder, and maybe the industry heavyweights in the film recognized at least a blurry reflection of that in this corny script. Perhaps the actual race to the Oscars, with the promoting and posturing to get a nomination and the studios’ subsequent negative campaigns against the other nominees, is almost as dirty and cutthroat as portrayed here.
Footnote #1:
Edith Head designed the costumes for 433 films. Given that, I suppose her astounding total of 34 Oscar nominations was just a result of Iversonian mathematics.
(In basketball, Allen Iverson realized that if you take 28 shots per game, you’re going to score a shitload of points, no matter how poor your success rate.)

Unlike you, I had never heard of this film before. I learned about it because ABC aired it in 1969 partly as a replacement for Turn-On. I gather ABC had a 90 minute block for a made-for-TV movie of the week and stretched the block to 2 hours to fill the Turn-On time slot.
I similarly misunderstood what Wiki wrote about that, and I initially thought The Oscar was a made for television movie that first aired in 1969. I put that into Google and when I got nothing, I thought it must be a really obscure made-for-TV movie despite having a couple fairly big named actors (although I don’t think it would have been totally impossible since Milton Berle was most famous for television and this was Tony Bennett’s first role.)
Anyone who loves bad movies as much as I do is well aware of this film. It’s basically the A-List version of The Lonely Lady.
I didn’t see it in 1965, but I hunted it down after reading The Golden Turkey Awards, the Bible of cinema crapola.
Poor Tony Bennett – such a nice man, such a jazz legend – I hate to see this stand as his acting legacy.
I’ve seen some of the bad movies that were in the Book of Lists based on the book. Not that it matters, but I think the Book of Lists came out before Michael Medved’s book as they were given an advanced copy.
Interestingly, many of the things stated about the movies in The Book of Lists if not Medved’s book are incorrect. I had seen Santa Claus Conquers the Martians previously, which I think is actually a pretty good clearly tongue in cheek movie. Again, why it’s reviewed as if it’s some kind of serious drama is beyond me.
However, the book is correct that Terror of Tiny Town, although an amusing premise with a few funny sight gags wears out its welcome pretty quickly, They Saved Hitler’s Brain is a complete mess made worse by the additional footage, and The Conqueror starring John Wayne is truly awful. I had to see it in three segments over three days because I kept saying to myself “I can’t take any more of this today.”
There is also a movie about Martians invading a beach that I saw that was mentioned in that Book of Lists list, but contrary to what’s written there, nobody in the film unfortunately ever says “it’s the voodoo I tells ya!’
I remember buying, and immensely enjoying, these books when they first came out, but in the years since streaming and the internet have made every obscure and semi-forgotten movie instantly available, so the books are now hopelessly outdated. I would propose some kind of NCAA tournament-style competition to determine what is, in fact, the cheesiest movie of all time. The only problem would be to limit the choices to just 64 contenders. (Birdemic and Manos would surely be top seeds.)
There were things like Elvira that highlighted some terrible movies even before this book and those like them came out.
I agree that books these days probably aren’t needed given Wiki and movie forums although for people who like longer form discussion of the films, how they got greenlit… they can still be fun and interesting.
However, I don’t have streaming and it actually isn’t that easy to find many movies on the internet. For instance, I had, I believe a 720P copy of Legacy the British film with Olivia Chenery’s nudity, and I wanted to upgrade so I looked on the torrents (whatever that is) and I couldn’t find it.
I could be wrong but I think streaming generally makes available only popular stuff and that is generally newer, there are, of course, things like archive.org as well, but I think it’s probably more difficult to find especially older stuff than you’d think.
For an example of even if everything is available why curation still helps: I’ve never heard of the films Birdemic and Manos. Other than you mentioning them here, I’d have no way of knowing these are terrible movies.
Jill St. John, hot stuff – I know Elke posed nude, did Jill ever?
Partially nude at least, yes.