There is something I don’t get about these pics of Elsie Hewitt. The Daily Mail says they are new, but she’s kissing Pete Davidson, and he’s all inked up in the photos. Yet there are recent pictures where his tats are gone. According to Pete, it took hundreds of thousands of dollars and five years of his life to remove more than a hundred tattoos.
So either the inkless pics are a combination of body make-up and photoshop, or the pics of him with Hewitt are old.
Well, whenever the pics were taken, she has or had a cute butt:
I know he’s getting them removed but there’s no way those recent photos aren’t also edited. Theres no way he’d have zero evidence of the old tattoos like that.
He looks like he’s covered in body make-up, so I guess they could hide the tats that way.
Or there’s lots of ‘shopping.
Or both.
He also looks too thin in those no-tat pics. I saw him very recently on Seth Meyers and Jimmy Kimmel, and he looked much thicker. That kind of turns the evidence toward Photoshopping.
Speaking to Late Night host Seth Meyers in February, Davidson admitted that he doesn’t know long the removal process will take but said he hopes to complete the process in under 10 years.
‘No, I didn’t realize it would take — like, when I’m 40, it’ll all be gone, like the chest and the back,’ he said.
It’s nice he has a hobby. And when these run out, he can get more tattoos and start over!