Comments and film clips by Johnny Moronic
More 90s movies with another B-grade erotic thriller. William Forsythe plays an Elvis-obsessed, wrongly-accused criminal who’s been let out of prison after 14 years. In the middle-of-nowhere he’s picked up by sexy Rita (Kari Wuhrer) and he can’t believe his luck. It must be too good to be true. Of course it is. She’s a call-girl who works for a Las Vegas gangster (Leo Rossi) who wants to know where the money from a heist is. The crim didn’t do that heist, so he doesn’t know. Of course, the crim and Rita fall for one another but he can’t quite trust her, and the gangster is persistent. But the crim is always one step ahead of everyone. Typical B-grade thriller with the strange casting of Forsythe as the leading man, although he seems to have been heavily involved in the movie, so it’s not such a surprise he stars. He’s pretty good. Wuhrer plays bimbo well and wears a number of short dresses, but she showed more in plenty of other 90s movies. At times the movie is quite comical, although I’m not sure this is how it’s supposed to be.
Scoop’s note: This is from a rather poor quality DVD, and the scene itself is poorly lit.
Raw image
Enhanced
Johnny Moronic’s videos can be found here
Kari was one of the big ones from my teenage years. She made stuff that could be considered softcore, but were still kind of legit movies in a way. They’d have a semi-legit actor like Tom Beringer or Eric Roberts or Lou Diamond Phillips in them.
It was like a classier step up from the Cinemax stuff. But she still got naked constantly.
Insanely hot woman
Why do you keep posting this stupid AI „enhancements“
Most of the pics don’t even look like the celebs,
If you don’t like them, don’t look. There are plenty of us who do.
An AI fake is still a fake. There were sites where you could look at fakes prior to AI. They were not very interesting, and AI has not made them more interesting. Some of us are hoping that Scoop’s site, which has been great for years, will not head in that direction.
These aren’t fakes though. As mixed as the results are, I see this more like retouching – if they’d just light these scenes properly to start with it wouldn’t be needed. And as the technology improves, so will the results.
When AI is adjusting the exposure, contrast, highlights, colour balance, etc.- all things, BTW, that generally still can be better done manually by a skilled photo technician – then the product is not a fake. When it is filling in details that are not there, very often not that well, it is a fake. AI is generally doing both, so it is generally a fake.
Wow is that wrong! You have been grossly misinformed. I can’t use Grok for this site because they don’t accept nudity, but in terms of video editing, it can do in a five minutes what could take a skilled technician weeks. And there is no guarantee that the manual edit would be better. And in colorizing, a young skilled technician would die still trying to equal what Grok can do in less than a minute. The reason is that Grok is all the skilled technicians combined, and capable of thinking millions of times faster. Grok did a colorized version of my parents’ wedding that absolutely dazzled the oldster who was in the party and is still alive. To be fair, I had a very bad color photo and a great, clear, hi-def, professional B&W, and I simply told Grok to take the colors from the bad photo and apply them to the B&W. Within seconds I had a masterpiece.
Of course, I know all of those people from maybe seven years later, when I was five or so, plus I have the original professional photo, and I can say that it is perfect. A human could duplicate it with days of painstaking work, but could not possibly improve it.
Unfortunately. I have to use far less sophisticated models because the big three (Grok, GPT and Gemini/Nano) will not accept nudity.
Oh, Kari was someone I jacked off to a lot during my teenage years in the 90s. Good times.